Diatom of the Month August 2019 - Diatom blooms and their effects on human health
Diatom
blooms and their effects on human health
by
Kyle Scotese*
Humans
have long benefited from algae in many ways; from breathing the oxygen released
during photosynthesis or consuming algae and organisms that feed on algae, to
using their components and extracts in everything from foods to fuels, medicines
and cosmetics. However, as Paracelsus wisely said, "All things are poison,
and nothing is without poison, the dosage alone makes it so a thing is not a
poison". While algae are not a problem per se, too many algae can be an
issue, just like too much sugar in our diet may negatively impact our health.
Many
types of algae, including cyanobacteria, dinoflagellates and diatoms, can
generate massive populations with densities greater than 15,000,000 cells per
liter, stretching for hundreds or even thousands of square kilometers in water
bodies (Bates, Garrison, Horner, 1998). These
blooms can proliferate and dieback in a matter of days or return seasonally for
decades. Some algal blooms pose no threat to other life forms, and simply
provide an abundant food source for various predators, like when Aulacoseira
blooms under thick ice in Lake Baikal (Kostrikina, Shimaraeva et al 2013). However,
in other instances impacts may be catastrophic. Hazardous algal blooms have
cost lives and resources and continue to worsen with global climate change,
which tends to select for noxious and toxic algae, as many of these organisms
are favored by warmer waters (Paerl & Huisman, 2008).
Fig 1. Chaetoceros aff. diadema (with Skeletonema spp)
from plankton. Preserved material.
Fig 2. Chaetoceros diadema from plankton. Preserved
material.
Diatom
blooms are dynamic system events during which certain photosynthetic
single-celled organisms able to exploit both biotic and abiotic factors become
dominant. Blooms can involve more than one type of microbe and often result
from and influence interactions between predators and prey. Diatoms are part of
the algal community sometimes referred to as "hard algae" because of
their silica frustule that is often ornamented with elaborate spikes, thorns, or
spines. While these structural adaptations are known to confer advantage by
facilitating suspension in the water column, they also can serve as effective
predatory defenses. Some diatoms are capable of forming long filamentous
ribbons or chains and may also have spines or sharp projections. When these
species bloom, their anatomical enhancements cause serious or fatal injury to
predators as can happen with many Chaetoceros species clogging or
puncturing fish gills with their needle-like setae (Figs 1 - 3)
Fig 3. Chaetoceros didymus from plankton. Preserved
material.
Other
effects from blooms include production of phycotoxins (Sorinho, Camargo et al.
2017), low dissolved oxygen from their decomposition by bacteria, and water
fouling taste and odor problems. For example, drinking water can taste earthy
and musty or have a fishy or rancid smell from metabolites produced by
proliferative diatom growth and degradation (Watson & Jüttner, 2019). Although
diatom blooms occur regularly and globally in many marine and fresh waters, toxic
events are restricted primarily to marine and coastal systems. For example, Halamphora
coffeiformis (formerly Amphora coffeaeformis) and 26 known Pseudo-nitzschia
spp (Fig 4) occasionally produce and release potent toxins such as domoic acid which
causes Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning (ASP) also called Domoic Acid Poisoning
(DAP). Some cells may produce toxins and the levels of DA are influenced by
warmer ocean conditions during upwelling season (McKibben, Peterson et al
2017), nutrient fluctuations (Mos, 2001), presence of bacteria (Lelong, Soudant
et al 2014), and trace metals such as iron (Sobrinho, de Camargo et al 2017).
Fig.4. Pseudo-nitzschia spp. from plankton. Preserved
material.
Even
after a bloom dies off, toxins may persist for weeks or longer dissolved in the
water, affecting rate of feeding, reproduction and development in multiple organisms
such as zooplankton, clams, crabs, anchovies, albacore, pelicans, dolphins, sea
lions, whales, rodents, primates and humans (Lefebvre, Bargu et al 2002). Mass wildlife
mortality events have also been linked to domoic acid (Smith, Connell et al
2018). Toxins can bioaccumulate in diatom predators like mussels and scallops, concentrating
the domoic acid in their tissues. These organisms may later be consumed by
higher predators which unknowingly ingest lethal phycotoxins. These algal
poisons can interfere with neuronal development, cause illness, epilepsy,
paralysis, limbic system damage or death in the unlucky victim. Symptoms of DAP
include gastrointestinal cramping, nausea and vomiting, seizures, death,
disorientation and memory loss ranging from temporary to permanent amnesia. The
first deaths linked to DAP from Pseudo-nitzschia were three elderly
people who ingested contaminated mussels in 1987 (Bates, de Freitas et al 1989),
leading to increased monitoring efforts and research. Periodic detection of
these toxins has closed fisheries and aqua-farming operations until their
products test clean.
The
beauty of diatoms belies the potential deadly effects of some species. While it
is difficult to directly affect bloom conditions, reducing nutrient loads helps
limit uncontrolled algal growth. Diatom blooms have been studied for centuries
to record water quality changes and increase awareness of the potential
deleterious or deadly health consequences for the many lifeforms in contact with
the affected water bodies. Tracking bloom dynamics is fundamental to better
understand how toxin formation is stimulated and the scale and duration of blooms
can be limited and their impacts mitigated.
Please leave a
comment below or email Kyle if you have comments or questions about the post.
References
Bates,
S.S., Bird, C.J., de Freitas, A.S.W., Foxall, R., Gilgan, M., Hanic, LA.,
Johnson, G.R., McCulloch, A.W., Odense, P., Pocklington, R., Quilliam, M.A.,
Sim, P.G., Smith, J.C., Subba Rao, D.V., Todd, E.C.D., Walter, J.A., Wright,
J.L.C., 1989. Pennate diatom Nitzschia pungens as the primary source of
domoic acid, a toxin in shellfish from eastern Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Can. J. Fish Aquati. Sci. 46, 1203-1215.
Bates,
S.S., Garrison, D.I., Horner, R.A., 1998. Bloom dynamics and physiology of
domoic-acidProducing Pseudo-nitzschia species. In: Anderson, D.M., Cembella,
A.D., Hallegraeff,
G.M.,
(Eds.), Physiological Ecology of Harmful Algal Blooms. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg,
pp. 267-292.
Kostrikina,
M.L., Shimaraeva, S.V., Krashchuk, L.S., Pislegina, E.V., Rusanovskaya, O.O.,
Silow, E. A., 2018. UPI Journal of Chemical and Life Sciences 1 (2): JCLS10.
Lefebvre,
K.A., Bargu, S., Kieckhefer, T., Silver, M.W., 2002. From sanddabs to blue
whales: The pervasiveness of domoic acid. Toxicon 40 pp. 971-977.
Lelong,
A., Hegaret, H., Soudant, P. 2014. Link between Domoic Acid Production and Cell
Physiology after Exchange of Bacterial Communities between Toxic Pseudo-nitzschia
multiseries and Non-Toxic Pseudo-nitzschia
delicatissima. Marine
Drugs 12, pp. 3587-3607.
McKibben,
S.M., Peterson, W., Wood, A.M., Trainer, V.L., Hunter, M., White, A.E. 2017.Climatic
regulation of the neurotoxin domoic acid. PNAS Vol 114 No. 2 pp. 239-244.
Mos,
L. 2001. Domoic acid: a fascinating marine toxin. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology
9 pp. 79-85.
Paerl,
H.W., Huisman, J. Blooms Like it Hot. 2008. Science Vol 320. May.
Smith,
J., Connell, P., Evans, R.H., Gellene, A.G., Howard, M.D.A., Jones, B.H.,
Kavaeggia, S.,Palmer, L., Schnetzer, A., Seegers, B.N., Seubert, E.L., Tatters,
A.O., Caron, D.A., A decade and a half of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and
domoic acid along the coast of southern California. 2018. Harmful Algae,
Article in press.
Sobrinho,
B.F., de Camargo, L.M., Sandrini-Neto, L., Kleemann, C. R., Machado, E. da
Costa, and Mafra Jr., L. L., 2017. Growth, Toxin Production and Allelopathic
Effects of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries under Iron Enriched Conditions. Marine
Drugs 15, 331.
Watson,
S. Jüttner, F. Biological production of taste and odour compounds. Taste and
Odour In Source and Drinking Water: Causes, Controls and Consequences. IWA
Publishing 2019.




Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. Due to an increased number of spam comments, we have felt the need to moderate this section. Your comment will appear in up to 72h. Thank you for your understanding.
Kind regards
Young ISDR